Istook Amendment

Home Up Join Contents Search


First Amendment Advocate, Vol. 3, No. 1, February 2002

The Newsletter of the Oklahoma Chapter of Americans United

Istook Introduces Another Prayer Amendment

U.S. Rep. Ernest Istook (R-Okla.) has unveiled another constitutional amendment to allow government-sponsored religion in public schools and other public buildings.


The "School Prayer Amendment," was introduced in the House of Representatives in December.  H.J. Res. 81 has already garnered the support of 74 co-sponsors, including high-profile lawmakers such as House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas) and J.C. Watts (R-Okla.)


AU says the proposal is misguided.  "Istook's radical scheme would bring devastating changes to religious liberty in this country," said Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United. "This proposal would bring a bulldozer to the wall that separates church and state, destroying many of the freedoms we currently enjoy.”


"Religious liberty is already alive and well in the United States, making Istook's proposal completely unnecessary," Lynn added. "Under the First Amendment, religion has flourished in this country as it has in no other. We should leave the Constitution alone."


Istook's third attempt to change the text of the Constitution now reads:  "To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience: Neither the United States nor any State shall establish any official religion, but the people’s right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions on public property, including schools, shall not be infringed.  The United States and the States shall not compose school prayers, nor require any person to join in prayer or other religious activity."


Lynn noted that, if added to the Constitution, Istook's amendment would bring sweeping changes to the church-state landscape.  Among the likely consequences would be teacher-led prayer in public school classrooms, evangelism by clergy at school assemblies and religious indoctrination in science and history classes. The proposal would also lead to display of the Ten Commandments and other religious scriptures in schools, courthouses and other public buildings.


Istook claims that his amendment is necessary to protect the right of students to exercise religious freedom at public schools.  Lynn described this argument as "nonsense."  "The idea that voluntary prayer has been banned in public schools is a myth," said Lynn. "The law only forbids schools from forcing religion onto students.  Parents -- not government officials -- are in charge of children's religious upbringing.”


"Students already have the right to read their chosen sacred texts in their free time, organize after-school religious clubs and say prayers before meals or at any time they seek spiritual guidance," Lynn concluded. "An amendment to protect school prayer is therefore completely unwarranted."



Home ] Up ]


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”

Copyright © 2003 Americans United -- Oklahoma Chapter  P.O. Box 892747 Oklahoma City, OK 73189.   Phone and Fax:  405-632-0037   Send mail to with questions about the Oklahoma Chapter of Americans United for Separation of Church and State


Send mail to with questions or comments about this web site.